The True Story of the reports of the Committee and ATU Text taken from: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=180259622989 Loredana Morandi came into contact with the Information Technology Committee Atu in late 2008 by sending your entry in the mailing list reserved to computer Atu, posing as a "columnist and blogger cutting national press office."
We were pleased that, since our "knowledge" of the Lady was limited to news only "ordinary" (and "harmless" precise duties) of one of his many blog photocopy.
Later, because of its availability, was asked if he could "help out" as well as over the years we have asked, with mixed success, to a range of subjects, political, labor, journalism, as can be seen from a careful reading of our blog (
http://blog.libero.it/comitatoatu ) without any subsequent problem, given the correctness of our people and we interested.
can not be said that Morandi has shown no ability to "disclosure" (though it does not appear to be a "journalist") and its behavior towards us for months has been "normal" and certainly productive. The moment in
which became our most important was when the representative of the time, Giuseppe Di Spirito, was ousted from the use in a questionable way, strange news that Morandi was able to get out through his tam-tam on many news agencies and newspapers in Naples .
From that moment cemented a mutual cooperation is absolutely voluntary and free of charge (it became clear almost immediately that our "cash float" we could not crabs) between representatives of the Committee and Loredana Morandi, also resulted in friendly relations and confidential. Flying
then all the "honeymoon" we arrive at the crash.
At the end of June 2009, while preparing for a conference on Justice in Caltanissetta, we saw one of the organizers, in particular with the representative Luigi Amico, there was some sort of misunderstanding between our Morandi, and another co-worker (always voluntary) Dr. Lidia Undiemi of Palermo, which already gives his and advice to LIDU all'ANLE (
http://www.esternalizzati.it/ ) associations for human rights and support to workers involved in outsourcing.
Without the issue to be discussed civilly, the involvement of Mr. Giorgio Ciaccio (involved in associations, Grillo meetup etc), which contributed to the drafting of a technical document
http://giorgiociaccio.wordpress.com/2009/07/08 / 01072009-document-design-proposal-of-alternative-computerization-justice / in Palermo as well as former author of the shooting of the previous meeting (always free) was not digested by Morandi for reasons still unexplained. His confused
arrows quickly invaded our mailing list, publishing private conversations with ease without the permission of the audience to invest Lidia Undiemi (until provoked and exasperated reaction) Luigi Amico and others, in a crescendo marked by insults, charges a new and unstoppable attitude of "if you do not agree with me - you are a scoundrel, too." In
everything was impossible to find a compromise, while we were trying to extinguish the fire, the Morandi information without our knowledge-of the facts alleged "serious" (But which?) Different subjects in our neighborhoods within the union and the Judiciary (which we had made our own at the time) of creating relationship problems that we did not really need.
At the same time he began to name all of a sudden insistence of "invoices" to be sent to anyone, "the tariff order of journalists" (although it had) and an alleged "copyright" for "material" on us, also the one with whom she had nothing to do-nothing-but "for information", as the report contributed by Lidia Undiemi (based in part on the writings of Dr. Carlo Sarzana Sant'Ippolito) Giorgio Ciaccio, and our .
baffled by his "change" and the fact that suddenly pretended "veto rights" on our activities, we reluctantly decided to remove him from the Committee (Note: She goes around saying that "there has downloaded" but it is one of the inventions) as you can see here:
At that point, already witnessing the birth of a smear campaign against us on Facebook, we tried to leave it in a gentle, as you can read at this link:
http://blog.libero.it/comitatoatu/7352917. html but to no avail, the fact that formula Morandi considered "seriously defamatory" and threatened retaliation complaints, and as usual, always babbling of alleged copyright material of his "property" to erase.
At that point, for the avoidance of doubt, we decided to remove all links to your site on our own, referring to items made on us (and often only due to contacts and events to which the U.S. had allowed to participate in our name, thanks to the work done by 5 / 15 years in the courthouses, public collection certificates of merit) and hope that enough. Instead
August 12, 2009 appears on his blog an article offensive that speaks of "defamation and exploitation of image" (?) "Mobbing" (?) Of a replacement hall "(who or what is not known, since that our rapporteur was not her on that occasion, but his "self-appointed") and showing some things that "prove" simply that there was a mutual collaboration, which is well known to those who follow us. At the same time
mutters of "deception" made by us against people we know for years and we respect and trust, and claim rights to the movie of "Pandora TV"
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v = qUUQiUiigF0 leaving puzzled the journalists and his colleague Joseph Marcialis (just fired and advocate together with another person's contact with Pandora) simply because months earlier he had given us the contact of ANOTHER journalist Web-TV (as seen even by email and publish it on his blog as alleged "proof" on their behalf) had concluded that without anything at that time.
Marcialis, for only uphold the truth, of course, will later be included in personal list of "criminals" of Morandi, live on Facebook, something that someone posts here Tracks:
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/8524/ luryfaccialibrouff.png .
would take too long to stand behind all the nonsense that has on us (and others), the fact is that among the other speaks of a "never received payment" knowing that we have NEVER made arrangements to do so and the questions currency "have always been left to the goodwill and the modest possibilities of each.
For pure consciousness and gratitude, before he went away, even if already on a collision course, doing it 2 transfers (from C / C to C / C) for 459 € including almost 40% of our cash on hand, as "reimbursement" standard for a number of expenses incurred during our knowledge.
Sum including the cameraman to interview the Senator and Armed € 80 not inclusive of other data directly to the U.S. cameraman for filming in the Day of Justice Naples, whose movie, delivered directly to Morandi in good faith, we do not know what has happened to.
We wonder whether in this respect has not occurred a crime of "embezzlement".
Noticing then that we have removed from our youtube account (discreetly followed
http://youtube.com/neoatu ) Armed with the video interview, change your mind again and intimate "restore it immediately."
If it were not tragic it would be funny, before asking not to use material that relates to intimate to someone then what is to broadcast on its channel.
As we witness to his clashes with various "on Facebook, and unfortunately, in good faith to people who are impressed by his eloquence, but then bitter regret, we decided to send formal notice on behalf of four people for the removal of harmful content from the site by publishing the same on ns. blog with the details obscured, to the protection of your privacy
http://blog.libero.it/comitatoatu/7670109.html The effect is bizarre, before starting to spam on our page on Facebook (the delete immediately) then reveals itself-it- thousands of people's identity hidden behind the thin patch, then as another hostile note to her blog and publish the same letter
http://biagioquotidiano.blogspot.com/2009/09/e-via-lennesima.html , begins to fantasize that the ns. the office has "bypassed" and "used a blog author of death threats" to send the notice, and denounce him for this and another set of assorted crimes and imaginative.
In fact it appears he simply declined to withdraw the letter of formal notice to the post. directed at people serious criminal record epithets such as "mafia" or close to areas fearing the Camorra, the Morandi then perseveres undaunted in various crimes against the image and privacy of a number of us, by publishing private correspondence, personal and even "secrets" without authorization (to the face of the code of ethics for journalists is an illusion to which they belong) and fraudulently using the latest knowledge on FB (which occurred right after the creation of the Working Party on Information Loredana Morandi "
http://www.facebook. com / group.php? gid = 58510057826 ) of some colleagues, particularly the Sicilian Luigi Amico (Luis Friend) with some "old acquaintances" of Morandi as "Maxi Barrel" and "Neuro Sissimo" (accused without any evidence known to us to be "homosexual pedophile inquiry") to proclaim a resounding "pact" crime Sicilian and Sardinian ".
Any comments on what is superfluous.
Following an email" anonymous "where everyone can read what they like, fabled further on the matter, and for the record, we also reported receiving an anonymous email that says that this was a misguided attempt to Morandi, the same misunderstood, to temper his resentment towards certain individuals, but none could be considered intellectually honest bizarre email anonymous "evidence" of anything.
What about the claims 3 "recommendations" which refers to Giuseppe Di Spirito and to write novels?
The first is simply a letter of Morandi, casting and writing spontaneously, following the press launch, the company had failed to renew the contract with my colleague, and for which has been widely thanked.
The second (the company itself) is exactly the opposite of a recommendation, sent to ONLY Giuseppe Di Spirito, had for the single vision by Morandi, NEVER authorized to release (and instead published it, complete with address home-air) and which suddenly fantasize that it was "directed at you" (statement tragicomic).
The third (an ex-member of AN) is a private letter, absolutely not "made out of the spirit" and that nemmemo mentions it (!) Sent from this lawyer to an undersecretary of the Ministry of Justice, supported the cause of Atu following a meeting with a group of workers.
These are defined by "too many of the recommendations of the Spirit"?
It takes a lot of imagination or "distraction" to support a headline like that.
And what of the charge of "illegal hacking to the archives of the Ministry of Justice"?
is the perverse ex-post interpretation of a speech (always private) engendered by some isolated protests, following the sending of the newsletter of the Committee Atu, known to most people.
doubts engendered by this incident, centered on the question whether or not to send spam-non-trade-in email addresses (standard, not secret) a government they are processed in a terrible crime of "hacking "in the mind of Morandi.
For the record, at the time thought otherwise, reassuring and calling to continue without fear in this type of operation will not be because at that time would have helped in notoriety? Who knows.
Then comes to bring up a colleague Calabrese, Edward Triolo, who had the (s) fortune to meet briefly with us after his dismissal-and second-invented on the spot that the profession of the father of Triolo (lawyer ) has come out in circumstances misleading "in June by the Advocate of the Spirit who is betrayed to avoid paying for"
Except that in this case is not and never, ever talked about fees for Work in a friendly way (among other things behind his constant "encouragement"), she was told almost immediately and directly Triolo's father, as reflected in serene communications era, so that after the publication of a Facebook e-mail that it testified to what
the Morandi hastens to "update" his article with a note: "... I never remembered this particular mid-June until now ..."
A prosecution of INNOCENT then followed by a too hasty "correction", as the dates and "ways" to continue to diverge, as can be seen!
Here's another email that already two months before the date of the fabled Morandi as further proof was aware of the fact that he has not been able to June 1: And after
The first falsehood, add another equal and opposite, namely that the press was so premeditated "advertised at a law firm Calabrese simply mentioning the name and surname of a person who has lost his job?
many logical leaps it takes to achieve similar statement, continuing to rage on a person already experienced its ups and downs?
At the end of September we decided to complain politely at the Swiss manager of your site, just getting in response an article she wrote for "damages" and "threats to the provider that we put in place.
But then poured in several other complaints, vilified by others.
We do not know if the operators have requested to remove the material and have been refused, or if you have it straight away.
responsibly fact is that your account has been disabled for the obvious enormity reported to the detriment of many, and now it is moved at a new American provider.
suddenly declared anywhere with bombastic advertisements in large letters that she had begun a "hunger strike" from October 1, 2009 against the "damage" suffered.
As if nothing had happened, if they have simply "forgotten".
Unbelievable but true.
Other complaints then were sent to providers resulting in new "bluster" Morandi of self-harm, aggravated by, inter alia, on a conference with the participation of ATU Gioacchino Genchi, Sonia Alfano, Luigi de Magistris.
To search for, say, to scare and "sabotage" the event, are sent by Morandi fax number and address letters to prosecutors, Police Offices, individuals of various kinds and levels. We are providing
to find them to forward them to our lawyers.
In these missives are reported allegations without any foundation that we seek payment.
apply to everyone, finally, this statement made publicly in the Morandi listacomitato, before it was removed for his excesses, coupled with what the other hand argued later, but later denied further:
the face of such evidence, the events continue in reporting false, distorted or out of context is not clear what benefit will have on its already damaged image.
But that a rational person would have realized a long time.
Until the next episode.
